Tokyo Table Trip

Logo discover 8a060a5a25d78a2d81322b0a16884eb1c05869ebadb772a16350e198984e5cfb


Anyone been to Sushi Kizaki recently?


The name has popped up multiple times so I'm interested to opt for their lunch course. Would love to know your guys thought! Thanks

Add photos


I booked Kizaki's lunch for my December trip. Will update in here if needed.

1668086301 Reply
Add photos

Just went for lunch recently. Booked the ¥13200 lunch course through Omakase, but ended up with a slightly different course (3 extra otsumami) for ¥24200. Felt slightly underwhelmed on the value front, since the rest of the nigiri were the same, and the 3 otsumami — sawara sashimi, ika geso yaki, and managatsuo shioyaki — were merely okay.

The flavour profile of the shari was pretty much similar to Sushi Tokami / Hakkoku, so if you like it there, you’ll like it here. And the tossaki handroll to start was yet another callback. Some of the neta was fantastic, like the freshly boiled kuruma ebi, tairagai, kawahagi, and chutoro. But there were also some that underwhelmed slightly, the anago wasn’t as pillowy as I preferred, and the uni didn’t have the lingering depth of flavour I expected at that price point.

Overall, had I gotten the lunch course, I’d rate it pretty positive on the value front. But given the mix-up and little value add for the full price menu, I don’t see myself returning.

1668588749 Reply
Add photos

Thank you JJ for your review. Seem like if I were to go there, I should make sure I opt the only nigiri lunch course.

1668604937 Reply
Add photos

Thanks JJ, probably not so appealing to me now as I didn't enjoy hakkoku.

1668610987 Reply
Add photos

@JJ thanks for the review and sorry to hear about the mixup with the course/pricing - that can definitely sour the experience.

1669019318 Reply
Add photos

Indeed, still unsure how the mixup happened :/

1669051354 Reply
Add photos

Can I ask between hakkoku and kizaki? Which is more recommended?

1669387582 Reply
Add photos